An ultra-conservative's views on this and that

15 January 2011

"It was eight years ago, let it go"

So said a commenter on Media Matters in response to Rush Limbaugh's comparison of the Memorial Service for the victims of the Tucson shooting with the Memorial-turned-pep-rally for Sen. Paul Wellstone in Minnesota in 2002.

Let it go, the commenter said. It was eight years ago.

Hmmm, you mean like the way the liberals have let go the Bush-stole-the-election meme from 2000, ten years ago?

08 January 2011

A mixture of emotions just beneath the surface...

Every time one of these nutjobs goes on a killing rampage, there is a universal constant:

No-class lefties will find a way to assign blame to the right wing BEFORE they even offer their condolences.

Think about that for a moment: They place their ideology above a person's life. They are that despicable. Yet, I can't be angry with them. I can only pity them.

The alleged shooter may very well be a right-winger. But is it really the time to be arguing this?

I can't say I'm surprised. I once had dinner sitting next to a seemingly-normal middle-aged man who fervently believed that Senator Paul Wellstone was assassinated by the Bush administration.

Some people are blind to the possibility that those whom do not agree with them are not sociopaths.

Of course, another favorite debate tactic of these despicable human beings is to characterize them and anybody with similar political beliefs as mindless drones who get whipped up into a frenzy by "inflammatory rhetoric."

Yes, because everyone on the left thinks for themselves, and no one on the right does. Remember the woman who stood in line for "Obama money"? Or the rash of gunmen whom have been ascribed as "right-wingers" until someone found their readings habits just a little to the left of Mao?

People who commit acts of violence to promote their politics have a screw loose, regardless of whether they're Marxists, anarchists, Fascists, or "Centrists" (usually self-described). Usually, their ideology does not make them violent. Otherwise, I and the Wellstone conspiracy theorist might have gone three rounds. Granted, I took an immediate disliking to the man as soon as he shared his nutty theory. Had I declared myself a member of the Right, would he have tried to beat me into submission with his fists? Doubtful.

The immediate reaction to this from the Far Left, and their aptness to quickly blame "divisive" language follows a pattern. Not too long ago, I wrote of the ridiculous notion that "words can hurt." Could it be that the Far Left wants to tie every act of violence immediately to words they don't agree with? I thought they were the champions of the First Amendment?

04 January 2011

Visited countries

Visited Countries

Visited Countries Map from TravelBlog

When building a case against conservatives...

... a little bit of advice:  Your first piece of "evidence" shouldn't be allegations of racial epithets shouted at members of Congress, especially when there were thousands of protesters in attendance, many of them with phones capable of capturing video.  Strange that no one has come forward to claim Andrew Breitbart's $100k reward for video evidence.  I'm fairly conservative, but if I had proof, I'd give up a member of my own family for the chance to pay off the mortgage in one fell swoop.

But the story beats on:  Liberals accept at face value the word of a member of Congress, despite video from several angles that doesn't corroborate the accusations.  Or the witnesses' ability to have heard the epithets.  Or their recollection of what they did in reaction to them.  Other than that, the claim is perfectly verifiable.

Wait a minute!  Since when do we accept the word of a politician?  For years now, have we not heard "Bush lied, people died"?  Strange that witness testimony is unimpeachable if the witness has a "D" next to his or her name.

Wait a minute, I'm using liberal logic:  The burden of proof is on me, the evil, baby-eating, Gaig-killing conservative to prove that hateful words were not spoken.  Just like it's up to me and my kind to prove the allegations made against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce this past political season weren't true.

Naturally, the Left still hasn't let this go.  Know why?  Righteous indignation:  How dare you call Rep. Lewis a liar for saying you Tea-baggers *hee-hee* called him a nigger!  Why he marched with Martin Luther King, Jr!

So?  So did Jesse Jackson, expert shakedown artist behind PUSH.

MLK has been dead for thirty years.  People change.  Including people that marched with him.  Not that they were ever entitled to absolute moral authority on anything!

And to this day, facts still trump absolute moral authority.  No video footage of it?  And the only footage there is doesn't prove anything?  Sorry, Facts and a pair of Fives still beats Absolute Moral Authority and three Aces.  No, I will not respect your authoritah!

Seriously, I'd be willing to split the $100k with anyone who's got the video.