As I grow older, it becomes important to me that I make informed decisions, both as a person and in a leadership role in my jobs.
So when I see an article on The Huffington Post about how there still exists pay inequity between men and women, I read it. My skeptic's radar may go on full blast, but I'll hear what the author has to say.
Unfortunately, it was nothing but a lot of bluster with no supporting factual evidence. So I had to go and find something to support the author's argument. What I found was this. How did they calculate this inequity? Just as I suspected: Take the number of men and women in this country, take their wages, and average them on a general gender basis. Yeah, that's accurate. What about the relatively new entry by a majority of women into the marketplace? What about the fact that women remain a minority in many high-paying jobs in engineering, computers, and science? Or high-risk jobs?
The pay inequity debate often ignores a question I have: If women are paid less for the same work, why are more women unemployed than men? A shrewd business owner would employ women if they were cheaper.
20 April 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment